General » Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Reminder of the previous message
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 02/09/2014 @ 20:53:04, By mike962
how about this ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_734558.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_734558.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 04/09/2014 @ 20:00:08, By mike962
busted
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_588245.html
ID written on it..
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_736049.html
very bad quality stock footage
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_296658.html
and this? nearly totally obscured
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_706167.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_631774.html
Latest Edition: 04/09/2014 @ 20:02:50
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_588245.html
ID written on it..
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_736049.html
very bad quality stock footage
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_296658.html
and this? nearly totally obscured
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_706167.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_631774.html
Latest Edition: 04/09/2014 @ 20:02:50
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 04/09/2014 @ 20:16:18, By antp
I saw the pics but missed the name
If you had put all in the same comment (as I often asked) instead of making three separate one...
Latest Edition: 04/09/2014 @ 20:16:35
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 05/09/2014 @ 17:09:09, By mike962
this needs a correction after reexaming it
it's a GArwood crane on a FWD truck carrier , bad quality pic and very similar design made me mis ID it
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_244433-Lorain.html
and this looks rather like a CCC instead of FWD, again very very similar design but noticed the slope at top of air intakes differes
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_375334-FWD.html
it's a GArwood crane on a FWD truck carrier , bad quality pic and very similar design made me mis ID it
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_244433-Lorain.html
and this looks rather like a CCC instead of FWD, again very very similar design but noticed the slope at top of air intakes differes
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_375334-FWD.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 06/09/2014 @ 12:22:42, By mike962
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 07/09/2014 @ 16:36:04, By Gamer
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 07/09/2014 @ 20:46:33, By mike962
this does NOT look self-prepeleld rather towed by tractor perhpas
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_507050.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_507050.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 08/09/2014 @ 08:52:55, By Gamer
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 08/09/2014 @ 10:11:24, By antp
For the second one, night cub's comment still applies to the links posted...
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 09/09/2014 @ 19:53:58, By mike962
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 12/09/2014 @ 18:23:05, By mike962
Volvo BM by default ? cos look it yourself...
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_697716.html
wrong category and solved
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_737814.html
I go with Spartan
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_532461.html
rtsbusman1997 didn't provide any arguments why KME while the grill clearly looks Spartan
this cabins are outsorced and used by a lot of producers so the grills have to be used as reference...
Latest Edition: 12/09/2014 @ 18:25:15
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_697716.html
wrong category and solved
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_737814.html
I go with Spartan
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_532461.html
rtsbusman1997 didn't provide any arguments why KME while the grill clearly looks Spartan
this cabins are outsorced and used by a lot of producers so the grills have to be used as reference...
Latest Edition: 12/09/2014 @ 18:25:15
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/09/2014 @ 18:24:43, By mike962
this needs a small correction and origin USA
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=737730
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=737730
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 15/09/2014 @ 20:08:29, By mike962
busted but aren't the ambulances more in foreground ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=737776
isn't this too far in background ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_367224.html
and this is really realy BAD quality stock footage in music video , why do keep it ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_296658.html
Latest Edition: 15/09/2014 @ 20:10:56
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=737776
isn't this too far in background ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_367224.html
and this is really realy BAD quality stock footage in music video , why do keep it ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_296658.html
Latest Edition: 15/09/2014 @ 20:10:56
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 15/09/2014 @ 20:31:24, By mike962
Custom Made "Petpak" looks put together out of scrap and old car bits , see thumbnail , certanly not something professionally made at all
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_552837.html
model origin Australia
Latest Edition: 15/09/2014 @ 20:33:23
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_552837.html
model origin Australia
Latest Edition: 15/09/2014 @ 20:33:23
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 16/09/2014 @ 19:33:47, By mike962
Seagrave
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_737776.html
has a DODGE badge so at least highly connected with it
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_728940.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_737776.html
has a DODGE badge so at least highly connected with it
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_728940.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 16/09/2014 @ 19:34:27, By mike962
there is nothing visible of this, why do we keep it ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_697716.html
you can't ID what you can't see and if you can't see it enough what's the point cos even a visitor doesn't see much
Latest Edition: 16/09/2014 @ 19:35:32
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_697716.html
you can't ID what you can't see and if you can't see it enough what's the point cos even a visitor doesn't see much
Latest Edition: 16/09/2014 @ 19:35:32
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 18/09/2014 @ 20:09:25, By mike962
this was missed
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_739791.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_739791.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 19/09/2014 @ 22:01:29, By mike962
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 22/09/2014 @ 19:43:03, By mike962
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 22/09/2014 @ 20:52:24, By antp
It was not missed. I was sure you would post that one here... He said "most probably", so I was waiting for a confirmation. If you confirm, why not post a comment saying so ?
Latest Edition: 22/09/2014 @ 20:52:48
Latest Edition: 22/09/2014 @ 20:52:48
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 22/09/2014 @ 22:40:45, By mike962
because it's rather hard to confirm anything for sure from that view but that said it looks to have a covered up JCB logo on the amr cos same position where they put it
http://www.cheffins.co.uk/assets/catalogues/lots/254/2524__3.jpg
but as said not really worth keeping for 1 star... since only the arm is really visible
why not introduce some visibility standarrds already for 1 and 2 star ??? in this way you might solve the HD problem partially
I think this can be named Someca
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_577500.html
Latest Edition: 22/09/2014 @ 22:42:44
http://www.cheffins.co.uk/assets/catalogues/lots/254/2524__3.jpg
but as said not really worth keeping for 1 star... since only the arm is really visible
why not introduce some visibility standarrds already for 1 and 2 star ??? in this way you might solve the HD problem partially
I think this can be named Someca
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_577500.html
Latest Edition: 22/09/2014 @ 22:42:44
Add Reply