http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_695827-Komatsu.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=916732
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=373140

pic replacement

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=208356


zero doubts on this
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=916994


germany and can be left without model name

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=916195

but just Unimog is a little vague as model name

a LOT of them are listed just Unimog
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Mercedes-Benz_model-Unimog.html

Unimogs are easy to narrow down - those listed just as Unimog are simply a result of the uploader not wanting to have them narrowed down yet they should be.

but it's better to list it as Unimog and then just have someone go thru them and determine exact models for each one , otherwise it's just another MErcedes-benz unknown in a sea of all sorts of Mercedes unknows


http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=916986
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=917835
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=917593
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=918185
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=918163

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=512715

a MIS-ID
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=691464

... but there's only four pages of unknown if you check the "simple truck"-box...

but it's much easier to go thur trucks that are already listed as Unimog then trying to fish them out of unknown, and heck they are Unimog so it's not that wrong to list them

this was solved
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_912008.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_915440.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_907778.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_902488.html


isn't this too bad visible? as no cab on this fire truck
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_913260.html

and BTW LAteef it's almost impossible to determine exact model

for example in the 60s you had
1960s[edit]

1971 model Unimog 406, as a Zweiwegefahrzeug ("Railway two-way vehicle" used for rail car shunting Rail car mover)
The 406/416 middle series were produced beginning in 1963. They were equipped with a four-cylinder Diesel (OM312) producing 65 hp (48 kW). The 406 and 416 are similar, The 416 having a longer 2,900 mm (110 in) wheelbase compared to 2,380 mm (94 in) for the 406. Later models were equipped with the direct injection OM352 Diesel engines starting with 80 hp (60 kW) and going up to 110 hp (82 kW).

Between the original Unimog and the middle series, Daimler-Benz developed a light series 421/403. This was later supplemented by the 413 line. They differ by the wheelbase and the engine power. The 421 has a 2,380 mm (94 in) wheelbase and the 403 has a 2,250 mm (89 in) wheelbase. The new engines come from the passenger car line (421/U of 40 hp (30 kW) with 2.2-litre capacity), and from the Benz truck line (403/U of 54 hp (40 kW) with 4.8-litre capacity).

The 100,000th Unimog was built in 1966 in Gaggenau
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unimog#1970s


now tell me that you seriously can determine the wheelbase on some lousy shots specially if they are just from the front

Impossible to you, perhaps - but Unimogs have a large following, I'm sure there will be an expert appearing on the site who can narrow them all down.

Even I could dedicate time to learn how to narrow them down ... but I'm currently pushing 25 and I have better things to do with my life

his recent solvings
http://www.imcdb.org/yourcomments.php?id=Bugmenot2

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=918430
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=918285
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=918429
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=916924

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=852428
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_837752.html

Are they accurate?

dunno about the bikes but the Zetor tractors do match and the SPS 240

think he actually is a czech user as he does this czech stuff


think you can check if the bikes match too

WB-Series
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=512715

Not really Unidentified, but need to correct them for some vehicles. I found out some website for 3D vehicles that used in anime and others animated series/movie.

Some example:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=750991
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=453078
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=453078
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=581307
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=629317
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=834005
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=869209
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=911832

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=919126

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=750941
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=414138

Lots more in my comment:
http://www.imcdb.org/yourcomments.php?id=opal

"Non-unidentified" That tile was kind of word play to say "identified"



Is that really reliable to assume they used these?

Yes, well at least for the Japanese website one.

For others may be wrong, like this one for example: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=573919

they have some errors the funniest ones being http://www.3dcadbrowser.com/download.aspx?3dmodel=6603 and http://www.3dcadbrowser.com/download.aspx?3dmodel=2386 and http://www.3dcadbrowser.com/download.aspx?3dmodel=13521 . The other errors i saw ( did not looked at everything and there is a bunch of vehicles that i never saw in real life so i can't tell if there is some mistakes but saw a 1996 Mustang with 1994 tailights and a 1995 NA Spec Escort wagon with a 1997+ front end... )

They could be used but we have to check for the MY