IMCDb Forum
Naming conventions » Incorrect spelling/listing
Category:  
« Previous topic
Reminder of the previous message
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 20/05/2016 @ 03:17:39, By eLMeR
Is this a topic for the German name Doppelkabine, or in general for the crew cabs?

The whole thread is neither for the German Doppelkabine nor for all crew cabs, "just" for all vehicles that could be wrongly listed in the IMCDb :smile:
But the post above is indeed specifically about the German Doppelkabine.

At first, marketed as a pick-up with a cabin of choice, later the doka as a model of its own. Except for the 1960 brochure - that is the exception to the rule.

So due to my researches in thesamba.com and vw-t2-bulli.de, apparently confirmed by what you say (if not coming from the same sources :wink: ), my question remains: according to all this, should we identify all of them as Doppelkabine or keep the 1960-62 models with the Pritshenwagen part?


Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 20/05/2016 @ 14:28:05, By Ddey65
I recently found out this old Chevy pickup which I originally thought was as old as a 1962, was more specifically a 1966:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_913815-Chevrolet-C-Series-1962.html\
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 20/05/2016 @ 20:20:56, By tore-40
I stand corrected, if I've mixed up the words topic/thread/post then I now know better. Yet there is no need to make me look like an a**, thank you, I'm capable of that myself, if that is my goal. I did notice the 17 other pages filled with comments. Or, with posts, if you prefer.

For the cars, I feel you should keep Pickup/Pritschenwagen (or whatever local name) for the first years, for 1963+ you could use Doka/Crew Cab/Double Cab as a seperate model. Please note, this should not be an issue just for the German cars.
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 20/05/2016 @ 21:13:35, By antp
Yet there is no need to make me look like an a**, thank you, I'm capable of that myself, if that is my goal. I did notice the 17 other pages filled with comments. Or, with posts, if you prefer.

I don't think that was the purpose of his reply. I also first misinterpreted your post, but didn't comment as I was unsure (I guessed you meant "does the question apply to VW, German vehicles or to all vehicles?")

Latest Edition: 20/05/2016 @ 21:13:50
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 25/05/2016 @ 00:34:38, By eLMeR
My apologies, my point wasn't to make you look like anything/anyone special. I was really tired that day and should obviously not have tried any kind of humor, even if I really thought it inconsequential and without any preconceived idea, at that time...

[...] I feel you should keep Pickup/Pritschenwagen (or whatever local name) for the first years, for 1963+ you could use Doka/Crew Cab/Double Cab as a seperate model. [...]

Despite the 1960 document showing also the Doppelkabine name?

[...]Please note, this should not be an issue just for the German cars.

I didn't dig for the non-German Dokas for now, so let's have it on the todo list :wink:

Latest Edition: 25/05/2016 @ 00:36:16
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 25/05/2016 @ 19:05:27, By antp

Despite the 1960 document showing also the Doppelkabine name?


It is just one document?
It is not like all advertisings/catalogues were using that name
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 26/05/2016 @ 04:30:08, By eLMeR
Pritschenwagen mit... for the 1961 & 1962 models without problem, but I am still somewhat divided over the 1960 model year, as I found 2 documents using the 2 contradictory ways of calling the Doka (see the concerned post) :wink:

Let's make it Pritschenwagen mit... for 1960 (by default), 1961 and 1962, and Doppelkabine only for the following years?
At least for the German models: the few I saw while searching German literature led me to think that the logic of the sales names was different in some other languages.

Latest Edition: 26/05/2016 @ 04:41:14
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 26/05/2016 @ 09:41:10, By antp
I think it will be easier to do that, it is already complicated enough with the change of name in 63, no need a different one just for 60 :grin:
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 05/08/2016 @ 03:46:08, By eLMeR
Known for now as VĂ©loSoleX 2200 and 3300 in the IMCDb, these mopeds should apparently have an S in front of their model name:
http://solexmillenium.fr/2200/MS220011.jpg http://solexmillenium.fr/2200/velosolex-2200.jpg
http://solexmillenium.fr/3300/33004.jpg http://solexmillenium.fr/3300/3300_5.jpg


No change needed for the predecessors (1400, 1700 & co.) nor for the successors (3800, 5000...), however:
http://solexmillenium.fr/1010/1010-4.jpg http://solexmillenium.fr/1400/14001.jpg http://solexmillenium.fr/1700/17001.jpg
http://solexmillenium.fr/3800/3800_2.jpg http://solexmillenium.fr/5000/Msolex-5000-16.jpg
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 05/08/2016 @ 17:24:29, By antp
done
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 06/08/2016 @ 04:52:38, By eLMeR
Thanks!
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 19/08/2016 @ 04:40:56, By eLMeR
Why are these 27 Jeeps identified as "Universal", with their model name (CJ-x) used as model/chassis code? A remnant of the beginning of the IMCDb?

Latest Edition: 19/08/2016 @ 04:43:09
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 19/08/2016 @ 09:52:43, By antp
Good question. Possibly it is indeed like how were listed cars like "Chevrolet Custom [C-10]"
However the naming of Jeep was not very clear for older models at some times.
Jeep was not always really the make, and the CJ-something was not always mentioned as model name, Universal was the civilian name.
cf discussion on http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=247391
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 22/08/2016 @ 06:31:42, By eLMeR
I was already aware of the "make problem", and had similar discussions with 4x4peru on other pages... Does anyone mind if I "reallocate" these pages to the corresponding categories?
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 22/08/2016 @ 17:33:01, By antp
Do as you think it is the best :wink:
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 23/08/2016 @ 00:59:21, By eLMeR
I'll try not to wreak (too) huge havoc in the Db :wink:
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 30/08/2016 @ 02:37:35, By Reg1992
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 03/09/2016 @ 19:58:31, By eLMeR
[...] Does anyone mind if I "reallocate" these pages to the corresponding categories?

Done!
I took the opportunity to clean a bit the Brazilian models. See here for explanations about the name (Willys without Overland, Jeep without CJ-5) and the possible model years (1955 or 1962).

The single 1966 identification is due to bob dieck, but the linked "source" is a forum in which the contributors seem more to say that they're unsure of it, for me... Should we really keep this MY?

Latest Edition: 03/09/2016 @ 20:00:09
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 09/10/2016 @ 07:45:09, By eLMeR
About Volvo's US truck division:
The Volvo White company (1981 to 1987) sold apparently its vehicles as White trucks, so nothing has to be changed for them:
http://i.imgur.com/ZBrBRrf.jpg

But the vehicles from the 1988-96 division (Volvo GM Heavy Truck corporation) were promoted as WHITEGMC models, not as White/GMC like done for now in the IMCDb. Shouldn't we use the same way of writing?
1988 WhiteGMC Aero Series - Brochure cover
1991 Truck line - Detail of the brochure cover
1993 WhiteGMC Conventional Aero - Brochure cover

(Click...)

http://i.imgur.com/d67IIza.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/qLDRLr3.jpg
(August) 1992 WhiteGMC WG64 - Parts book - Cover detail
1992 WhiteGMC ACM-ACL Series - Operator's manual - Cover detail


Or, as that could sound like a lot of capital letters, WhiteGMC?
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 09/10/2016 @ 11:48:38, By antp
On Wikipedia they mention "Volvo WhiteGMC" as make, but we could indeed use "WhiteGMC" rather than "White/GMC". The "/" was maybe added because there is a big one on the grille :grin:
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Incorrect spelling/listing
Published 16/10/2016 @ 04:21:21, By eLMeR
The "/" was maybe added because there is a big one on the grille :grin:

:smile:

On Wikipedia they mention "Volvo WhiteGMC" as make, but we could indeed use "WhiteGMC" rather than "White/GMC".

Volvo WhiteGMC was never used as make, I'm afraid that the WP page is another one written without checking...
But as the brochures show indeed Volvo and WhiteGMC together (but usually with WhiteGMC at first, see the pictures in the previous post), this could explain the mistake...

The accurate company name was Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corparation, and the 2 makes sold by it were Volvo and WhiteGMC:
http://i.imgur.com/bswseUD.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/xo1ufIp.jpg
(Both pictures are excerpts from the 1988 truck line brochure)
Add Reply - Category:  
Sign In :: Sign Up :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2024 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare