Send an answer to a topic: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
mike962
now you see why vintage ground conveyors are so incredible hard to find you hardly find anything on one even if you know what it is
Taylor-Dunn
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1489385.html
random background with no fine details visible
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1236647.html
Taylor-Dunn
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1489385.html
random background with no fine details visible
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1236647.html
antp
we have 3 of this listed as Centaure but others are listed as Salev Centaure maybe soem french speaker can do more digging ? but seems Salev is maker
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1582902-Centaure-Sierra-Estafette.html
There do not seem to be much to dig in
Commented on the page
mike962
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1659639.html
wrong translation by google translate so here correct one
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1695524-Dongmyeong-TEC-25-XM-2.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1666180-Dongmyeong-TEC-25-XM-2.html
we have 3 of this listed as Centaure but others are listed as Salev Centaure maybe soem french speaker can do more digging ? but seems Salev is maker
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1582902-Centaure-Sierra-Estafette.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Centaure.html
not Lanz, looks home made
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_435242-Lanz.html
wrong translation by google translate so here correct one
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1695524-Dongmyeong-TEC-25-XM-2.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1666180-Dongmyeong-TEC-25-XM-2.html
we have 3 of this listed as Centaure but others are listed as Salev Centaure maybe soem french speaker can do more digging ? but seems Salev is maker
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1582902-Centaure-Sierra-Estafette.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Centaure.html
not Lanz, looks home made
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_435242-Lanz.html
antp
Clearly part of the set and not a random background though.
Yes, that one is well visible. There is a difference between that and those partially visible in background, or too far away.
ChaserX
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1897918.html
Vehicle Year and Name Change
https://imcdb.org/vehicle_1910132-Opel-Omega.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1664970-Shinjin-Jeep.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1375045-Shinjin-Jeep.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1365667-SsangYong-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1438497-SsangYong-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1410711-SsangYong-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1742005-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1750774-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1871247-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1901460-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1842067-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1861068-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1992.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1733212-Dong-A-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1511933-Keohwa-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1436254-Keohwa-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1525203-Dong-A-Korando.html
and Trim Level
https://imcdb.org/vehicle_1580844-Hyundai-Sonata-EF-1999.html
Vehicle Year and Name Change
https://imcdb.org/vehicle_1910132-Opel-Omega.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1664970-Shinjin-Jeep.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1375045-Shinjin-Jeep.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1365667-SsangYong-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1438497-SsangYong-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1410711-SsangYong-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1742005-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1750774-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1871247-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1901460-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1842067-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1989.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1861068-SsangYong-Korando-KH-7-1992.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1733212-Dong-A-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1511933-Keohwa-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1436254-Keohwa-Korando.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1525203-Dong-A-Korando.html
and Trim Level
https://imcdb.org/vehicle_1580844-Hyundai-Sonata-EF-1999.html
Lateef
Clearly part of the set and not a random background though.
mike962
origin germany
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1912243-Scheuch-Schlepper-1943.html
wrong category but probably not worth listing
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1537847.html
chinese golf cart , found it but has no role
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1911195
Fenwick, not Salev, it's licensed copy of american Yale
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_570681-Salev.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_963802-Salev.html
Manox is the make here, remove Salev
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_570684-Salev-Manox.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1912243-Scheuch-Schlepper-1943.html
wrong category but probably not worth listing
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1537847.html
chinese golf cart , found it but has no role
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1911195
Fenwick, not Salev, it's licensed copy of american Yale
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_570681-Salev.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_963802-Salev.html
Manox is the make here, remove Salev
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_570684-Salev-Manox.html
antp
regarding moto cultivators shouldn't they get garden tractor // golf cart status ???? like list them only if they have a role and a bodywork
Yes these have no interest if just background
mike962
regarding moto cultivators shouldn't they get garden tractor // golf cart status ???? like list them only if they have a role and a bodywork
duplicate, to be deleted
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911226-Chevrolet-1941.html
International-Harvester family
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911957.html
vintage Komatsu FD-Series , a minor miracle to found this
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1272244.html
Caterpillar
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1912174.html
duplicate shot, but found that rock driller anyway
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911930.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911922.html
very very background
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1422039.html
Nissan, again solved only because some extra shots
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1391107.html
this no extra shots and about 2 seconds visible
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1685993.html
duplicate, to be deleted
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911226-Chevrolet-1941.html
International-Harvester family
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911957.html
vintage Komatsu FD-Series , a minor miracle to found this
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1272244.html
Caterpillar
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1912174.html
duplicate shot, but found that rock driller anyway
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911930.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1911922.html
very very background
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1422039.html
Nissan, again solved only because some extra shots
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1391107.html
this no extra shots and about 2 seconds visible
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1685993.html
antp
And as you prove it here, sometimes we can identify them
Identifiable or not, the problem is listing vehicles that should not be there. This one is close to actors, so probably noticeable, hence why it could be considered as worth listing (hypothetically), but often those with low visibility are just in a background of a warehouse and so not worth including anyway. And that can even be applied to some identifiable vehicles: being identifiable does not mean it is worth listing, sometimes you take time to identify something that should just be deleted, and for which you could say "not worth listing" like some more difficult ones
Identifiable or not, the problem is listing vehicles that should not be there. This one is close to actors, so probably noticeable, hence why it could be considered as worth listing (hypothetically), but often those with low visibility are just in a background of a warehouse and so not worth including anyway. And that can even be applied to some identifiable vehicles: being identifiable does not mean it is worth listing, sometimes you take time to identify something that should just be deleted, and for which you could say "not worth listing" like some more difficult ones