Answer :: IMCDb Forum

Send an answer to a topic: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

MisterZ

mike962

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2082893-1970.html

from a very bad quality soviet film , normally this soviet vehicles wouldn't be an issue

soviet RZDM, category construction vehicle
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2082887.html

and this 2 just nothing really visible
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2082876.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2082888.html

found evidence on this thing
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1110184.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1034171.html

antp

Sorry, too much things to do in little time, speed generates errors :grin:

(so does doing multiple things at the same time)

MisterZ

Hi antp, thanks for updating my list above. However you made 3 mistakes:

1927 not 2027:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2081993-Ford.html

1987 not 2008:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_913151-Kenworth-T-600-2008.html

[SY] not SX:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1647124-Ford-Territory-SX.html

Also:

1985+ T-600:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_487605-Kenworth-T-400.html

antp

I thought it was just minor changes, but if it is like a new series that would deserve its own code, then it is fine to keep as it is currently then.

MisterZ

Quote From: antp

Wouldn't it better to list all as just [SY] and use the mk field to have a "Series II" displayed beside the name?
I think this was already done with some other model

I suppose this could be done, but what's the difference in the end? I like SY II instead because when you click on it, it only shows SY II and doesn't include SY. The difference between the two was more than just minor, there were big changes (more changes than SX -> SY for example). SY II was essentially a new model code, except for some reason Ford decided not to give it a new model code.

It's not like SZ and SZ series II, where it was a minor update.

In short, SY II was a big upgrade, worthy of having its own unique code separate from SY.

antp

Quote From: UKboy205

@antp

You promised that you would check my links later but it's been 2 days now

I didn't say when. Sorry to be busy :tongue:

If I saw your message before processing your links, you would have earned one more day of wait time :lol:

Quote From: MisterZ

2009+ [SY II]:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2081273-Ford-Territory.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_655526-Ford-Territory-SY-2009.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_829438-Ford-Territory-SY-2009.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1898195-Ford-Territory-SY.html

Wouldn't it better to list all as just [SY] and use the mk field to have a "Series II" displayed beside the name?
I think this was already done with some other model

UKboy205

Quote From: antp

UKboy205 >> I'll check your links later

@antp

You promised that you would check my links later but it's been 2 days now

mike962

some ground conveyors this time , no scooters :grin:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2009993.html

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1740701.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1766028.html

body not visible
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1516294.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1557790.html

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_2081728.html

not manned
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1939271-1953.html

wreck
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_302020.html

make should be DMC
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_426298-De-Lorean-T-40.html

MisterZ

Subject
List of Smileys	[quote=mike962,90064]busted this old roller, a real miracle to find it https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1186798 isn't this too much like a go-kart ? and no role either https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1157721.html wrong category https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1929790-JCB-525-60.html model is L1203 https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_739393-Locust-1203.html IH https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1930325[/quote]
	Options
	%Receive notification of answer to this topic by email%
	%Analyse text for smileys%
	%Analyse text for BBCode%