Answer :: IMCDb Forum

Send an answer to a topic: [done]Godzilla: Tokyo S.O.S, Movie, 2003

Warning, this subject is old (6462 days without answer)

Subject
forum_emoticons.html	[quote=Jun,11407]You are too fast (than I process the pic :lol: ) [Test2] compressed to 100/43/26KB. there seems obvious loss is not visible for me :) (due to the original picture. if original is more sharp like the picture of digital camera, less compression is good choice) [URL=http://img228.imageshack.us/my.php?image=highsl2.jpg][url]http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/8333/highsl2.th.jpg[/url][/URL] [URL=http://img219.imageshack.us/my.php?image=high2jx1.jpg][url]http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/2783/high2jx1.th.jpg[/url][/URL] [URL=http://img219.imageshack.us/my.php?image=high3mn9.jpg][url]http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/9920/high3mn9.th.jpg[/url][/URL][/quote]
	Options
	Receive notification of answer to this topic by email
	Analyse text for smileys
	Analyse text for BBCode

antp

The original 28 KB (or the 26 KB here) are good I guess...

Jun

You are too fast (than I process the pic :lol:

)

[Test2]
compressed to 100/43/26KB. there seems obvious loss is not visible for me :smile:

(due to the original picture. if original is more sharp like the picture of digital camera, less compression is good choice)

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/8333/highsl2.th.jpg

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/2783/high2jx1.th.jpg

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/9920/high3mn9.th.jpg

antp

But that is more compressed, not less compressed :figti:

28 KB pic is good, but even if it is 30-something it is still not heavy

Jun

Quote From: antp

if it looses too much details? (as the file is only 28 KB, if it is few KB more it is still low)

Not so much, but without processing is the best :grin:

[Test]
compressed to 22/18/15KB. loss appeared especially on the plate number. (28KB pic above is better for quality:KB)

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/8590/lowhq5.th.jpg

http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/9944/low2as3.th.jpg

http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/8121/low3qo3.th.jpg

antp

That seems correct for me. The picture still look good. Maybe you can compress it a little less, if it looses too much details? (as the file is only 28 KB, if it is few KB more it is still low)

Jun

Is it looks correct?
(changed to 2.35:1)

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/723/2005302286496087761fixkt6.th.jpg

If these are right, I'll process & add.
...but picture detail & quality are lost actually :sad:

Gliffhanger

yeah alright i now....but i needed to do i quicky so i did this....but my favorite stays imageshack..

antp

For submitting pictures here on the forum you can use what you want for picture uploads, but for posting in the comments of the site it is better to use Imageshack :wink:

Gliffhanger

IMDB Website: http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0366526/

Gliffhanger

Unknown - One Star

http://aycu35.webshots.com/image/13994/2005397033680147346_th.jpg

Unknown - One Star

http://aycu27.webshots.com/image/14546/2005329402897820849_th.jpg

Unknown - One Star

http://aycu34.webshots.com/image/13153/2005380573839886953_th.jpg

Unknown - One Star

http://aycu29.webshots.com/image/12308/2005317934753750424_th.jpg

Unknown - One Star

http://aycu29.webshots.com/image/12308/2005302286496087761_th.jpg

unknown - Two Stars

http://aycu06.webshots.com/image/11325/2005312346175101974_th.jpg

Unknown - Two Stars

http://aycu11.webshots.com/image/13490/2005304559940026579_th.jpg

Unknown - Two Stars

http://aycu06.webshots.com/image/12325/2005363229848436917_th.jpg

These are most all military vehicles and i do not now each for sure.

I Used another other and faster UPLOAD Program, but i think that you all now how it works. You Can Try it to....its faster and simpler.
goodluck

Thanks Gliffhanger