Send an answer to a topic: [Done] the wild angles (1966)
Warning, this subject is old (5630 days without answer)
antp
Because these were posted by Sixcyl, who does not respect rules. Those will be deleted later anyway.
typhlosion
This is the last time I have to justify my decisions. If you spend your time in new movies you'll see the matter goes better.
Last time: backgrounds must improve the page and not make it worse.
24 is fuzzy, your 29 is obstructing the truck and not the previous one; and 37 and 39 are some blurred ....PLEASE we are speaking of simples background cars and usual cars of the 60s.
Don't waste your time adding pics like http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4910-car_wash_1976_redux.html
Do you think 97 backgrounds improve a page already listed with 28 pics?
i.e. A good background is your Triumph (38) but what are 34-37 littles and fuzzy cars seen through the window of a bar; or 43-68 littles, far, part seen of background cars.
If you like background cars it's perfect but like your Triumph, not like the rest.
Last time: backgrounds must improve the page and not make it worse.
24 is fuzzy, your 29 is obstructing the truck and not the previous one; and 37 and 39 are some blurred ....PLEASE we are speaking of simples background cars and usual cars of the 60s.
Don't waste your time adding pics like http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4910-car_wash_1976_redux.html
Do you think 97 backgrounds improve a page already listed with 28 pics?
i.e. A good background is your Triumph (38) but what are 34-37 littles and fuzzy cars seen through the window of a bar; or 43-68 littles, far, part seen of background cars.
If you like background cars it's perfect but like your Triumph, not like the rest.
then how come people get to add pics like these!!!!
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_235408.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_235551.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_235297-Cadillac.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_235327.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_235171.html
these have been posted within the last day or so!!!! these are all so bad i wouldn't even post them yet there allowed to be posted so i don't get it!!!??? i must be missing something??? please enlighten me!!!
vilero
This is the last time I have to justify my decisions. If you spend your time in new movies you'll see the matter goes better.
Last time: backgrounds must improve the page and not make it worse.
24 is fuzzy, your 29 is obstructing the truck and not the previous one; and 37 and 39 are some blurred ....PLEASE we are speaking of simples background cars and usual cars of the 60s.
Don't waste your time adding pics like http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4910-car_wash_1976_redux.html
Do you think 97 backgrounds improve a page already listed with 28 pics?
i.e. A good background is your Triumph (38) but what are 34-37 littles and fuzzy cars seen through the window of a bar; or 43-68 littles, far, part seen of background cars.
If you like background cars it's perfect but like your Triumph, not like the rest.
Last time: backgrounds must improve the page and not make it worse.
24 is fuzzy, your 29 is obstructing the truck and not the previous one; and 37 and 39 are some blurred ....PLEASE we are speaking of simples background cars and usual cars of the 60s.
Don't waste your time adding pics like http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4910-car_wash_1976_redux.html
Do you think 97 backgrounds improve a page already listed with 28 pics?
i.e. A good background is your Triumph (38) but what are 34-37 littles and fuzzy cars seen through the window of a bar; or 43-68 littles, far, part seen of background cars.
If you like background cars it's perfect but like your Triumph, not like the rest.
typhlosion
and whats wrong with images 24,29,37,and39?????
typhlosion
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_61189-The-Wild-Angels.html
Added some of the background pics. Changed some of the main pics (only which are better than the previuos ones and same shots). About the bikes, the movie was already listed by francisharley, one of our best experts in bikes, so all the models are listed.
You can add extra pics in comments.
Added some of the background pics. Changed some of the main pics (only which are better than the previuos ones and same shots). About the bikes, the movie was already listed by francisharley, one of our best experts in bikes, so all the models are listed.
You can add extra pics in comments.
how is that is that so??? he may be but that doesn't mean he got them all! and he didn't! he got 8 on the there now and i got 17!!! so that means 9 more should be added!!!
vilero
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_61189-The-Wild-Angels.html
Added some of the background pics. Changed some of the main pics (only which are better than the previuos ones and same shots). About the bikes, the movie was already listed by francisharley, one of our best experts in bikes, so all the models are listed.
You can add extra pics in comments.
Added some of the background pics. Changed some of the main pics (only which are better than the previuos ones and same shots). About the bikes, the movie was already listed by francisharley, one of our best experts in bikes, so all the models are listed.
You can add extra pics in comments.
vilero
I have modified 1st. answer adding only pics without black borders. It will take me some time to resize the pics because I have to download them in my PC to change the wide. Along this week I'll finish it.
tv boy
I have a lot of photos, especially from 1960s widescreen movies, where I have to change the heighth or width because the picture was distorted when I saved it. It's not usualy the movie so much as something in the software, though I do know there are movies that are already distorted and "The Wild Angels" may very well be one.
typhlosion
i barley notice a difference but it would be the dvd's fault as i only choped the top and bottom off and did not touche the with of the images
vilero