IMCDb Forum
Send an answer to a topic: Maker names
Warning, this subject is old (6717 days without answer)
Subject
Bold [b]Text[/b] Italic [i]Italic[/i] Underline [u]Underline[/u] Strike Out [strike]Strike Out[/strike]
Email [email=nobody@nobody.org]Name[/email] Link [url=http://www.website.com]Text[/url] Anchor [anchor]Name[/anchor] Image [img]http://www.website.com/image.jpg[/img]
Align Left [align=left]Text[/align] Centered [align=center]Text[/align] Align Right [align=right]Text[/align] Text Justify [align=justify]Text[/text]
Color [color=#000000]Text[/color] Highlight [highlight=pascal]Text[/highlight] Widgets Smileys :code: [:code] HTML to BBCode converter Word to BBCode converter
Preview Spell Checker

Copy Paste Cut Select All
Clear Insert Date Insert Time Insert Date and Time Insert your IP
List [list=square][item]BlaBla[/item][/list] Numbered List [list=decimal][item]BlaBla[/item][/list]
Quote [quote=name]Text[/quote] Spoiler [spoiler]James is the murderer![/spoiler]
Uppercase [uppercase]Text[/uppercase] Lowercase [lowercase]Text[/lowercase] l33t [l33t]I'm a Nerd[/l33t] Sub Script [sub]Text[/sub] Super Script [sup]Text[/sup] Size of Text [size=8]Text[/size]

Options
 
 
 
 
qwerty_86
Let's just leave it as it is. It would be long winded saying it's a General Motors Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale Brougham or Toyota Lexus ES330 or VW Audi Lamborghini Diablo.
Ddey65
Ooh, Subdivisions! GM had a lot of those in the 1920's & 1930's. LaSalle was a division of the Cadillac Motor Company, which itself was a division of General Motors. Marquette was a one-year(1930) division of Buick Motor Company, which itself is a division of GM. I believe Irving was a short-lived division of Oldsmobile Motor Company, which as we all know is a division of GM, and Pontiac was originally a division of the Oakland Motor Company, which superceeded Oakland in 1931.
wrenchhead
It would sure add problems to listing but I do find that kind of information interesting.

Don't mind me today, I have had too much sugar :lol: and am going at about 180 kph
antp
As groups change, I am not sure it is a good idea. See for example Daewoo : at a time it owned SsangYong, now it is owned by GM, but SsangYong was/is not owned by GM :grin:
Same for the MG, the group would depend on the year. I am not sure that it would really add useful info, but for sure it will add problems when we will have to list the vehicles :ohwell:
wrenchhead
I was just thinking about my MG and its British Leyland badge and am wondering, do we need a category for the parent company's name. For example, there is no chevrolet company. The company is General Motors Corporation and Chevrolet is simply a division of that company as is buick, oldsmobile, cadillac, Saab, etc.

My MGB has a British Leyland badge so technically it is a 1977 British Leyland MGB. Since its start, MG has been owned by several different companies: Morris, BMC, British Leyland.

Corporate ownership does make a very real difference in both the design and quality of cars. This makes me wonder if it would be a good idea to list the parent company as well as the simple brand name we generally use when we identify a car.

We make the distinction is some cases where we know the history. For example Dodge Brothers (independent) and Dodge (after Chrysler bought the company). The same would apply to Oldsmobile and many other brand names.


Category:  






Ada
CSS
Cobol
CPP
HTML
Fortran
Java
JavaScript
Pascal
Perl
PHP
Python
SQL
VB
XML
Anon URL
DailyMotion
eBay
Flickr
FLV
Google Video
Metacafe
MP3
SeeqPod
Veoh
Yahoo Video
YouTube
6px
8px
10px
12px
14px
16px
18px
Sign In :: Sign Up :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2024 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare