Send an answer to a topic: Mass change model info thread
MisterZ
528i:
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1767572-BMW-5-F10.html (2011+)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1912535-BMW-5-F10-2011.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1188117-BMW-5-F10-2011.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1237120-BMW-5-F10-2011.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1324884-BMW-5-F10.html (xDrive)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1271594-BMW-5-F10-2011.html (xDrive)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1382325-BMW-5-F10.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1767572-BMW-5-F10.html (2011+)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1912535-BMW-5-F10-2011.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1188117-BMW-5-F10-2011.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1237120-BMW-5-F10-2011.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1324884-BMW-5-F10.html (xDrive)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1271594-BMW-5-F10-2011.html (xDrive)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1382325-BMW-5-F10.html
night cub
We have 2 Ford Edge with chassis code CD539, 88 with CD539N and 41 with CD53N.
Is there a reason for these three different codes?
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD53N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
CD539N is the only one mentioned on the Wikipedia page
Is there a reason for these three different codes?
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD53N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
CD539N is the only one mentioned on the Wikipedia page
From what I can tell, the main code is CD539. The letter added after that code indicates which market it is made for. N for North American, X or E for Export, and C for China. So a code of CD539N is a North American model, etc.
The English Wikipedia page has "CD539". If you click on the CD4 Platform page, all four are listed. And then this page, about halfway down, goes into more detail:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KA467/Ford_development_codes
There is apparently an alternate code of CD389 used on the model as well.
I guess it depends how detailed we want to be with them. Technically, only the North American models should be listed as "CD539N". If you want to be able to separate each regions models, we should add the letters. Or keep it simple and just use "CD539".
I think the ones marked "CD53N" were a typo that somebody keeps repeating. If you do a search for that code and Ford Edge, it only returns links to our site.
The Chinese ones might be worth keeping a separate code, as they also include the China-only 3-row Edge Plus.
JB007
For Chrysler/Dodge Viper.
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Dodge_model-Viper.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Chrysler_model-Viper.html
For all 1991-1995 Chrysler/Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "SR I".
For all 1996-2002 Chrysler/Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "SR II".
For all 2003-2006 Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "ZB I".
and for this:
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_158002-Dodge-Viper-SRT-10-2007.html
For all 2008-2010 Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "ZB II".
For all 2013–2017 SRT/Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "VX".
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-SRT_model-Viper.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?resultsStyle=asImages&yearFrom=2012&yearTo=&makeMatch=- 2&make=dodge&modelMatch=1&model=viper&modelInclModel=on&modelInclChassis=on&mk=&origin=- &madein=&madefor=&role=
Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Viper
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Dodge_model-Viper.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Chrysler_model-Viper.html
For all 1991-1995 Chrysler/Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "SR I".
For all 1996-2002 Chrysler/Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "SR II".
For all 2003-2006 Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "ZB I".
and for this:
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_158002-Dodge-Viper-SRT-10-2007.html
For all 2008-2010 Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "ZB II".
For all 2013–2017 SRT/Dodge Viper, chassis-code is "VX".
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-SRT_model-Viper.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?resultsStyle=asImages&yearFrom=2012&yearTo=&makeMatch=- 2&make=dodge&modelMatch=1&model=viper&modelInclModel=on&modelInclChassis=on&mk=&origin=- &madein=&madefor=&role=
Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Viper
antp
We have 2 Ford Edge with chassis code CD539, 88 with CD539N and 41 with CD53N.
Is there a reason for these three different codes?
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD53N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
CD539N is the only one mentioned on the Wikipedia page
Is there a reason for these three different codes?
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD539N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Ford&model=CD53N&modelMatch=2&modelInclChassis=- on
CD539N is the only one mentioned on the Wikipedia page
antp
For the Supra it is widely used

Exiv96
MK shouldn’t be used on NA entries; even some that currently use them Prius and Mitsubishi (i think eclipse).
Most have chassis codes specific to their generation which would separate them without a need for an MK.
Most have chassis codes specific to their generation which would separate them without a need for an MK.
For the Prius aren't these often referenced by their generation?
It is not used officially, of course, but by car enthusiasts.
It is not used officially, of course, but by car enthusiasts.
Yes, it's a fan thing. I remember a "Mark" was added on Eclipses, Priuses and Supras, because "that's how their fans refer to them". On Eclipses, the "Mk" was quickly changed to "G" (1G, 2G, 3G, 4G) because that's the formulation they used in Eclipse forums. I can't argue with that, but I'm glad it hasn't been expanded to other japanese cars. For some models it would be a minefield.
antp
Yes, that one is big.
I changed the three to MPV.
I changed the three to MPV.
andyhao
Okay, now I think maybe it really looks too large to be a hatchback

antp
I think they should be changed the other way...
Wikipedia lists them as mini-MPV:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Note
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Livina
The Note is related to the Renault Modus that we listed mostly as MPV:
https://www.imcdb.org/search.php?resultsStyle=asList&sortBy=0&make=renault&model=- modus
(and that Wikipedia also lists as mini-MPV)
Wikipedia lists them as mini-MPV:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Note
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Livina
The Note is related to the Renault Modus that we listed mostly as MPV:
https://www.imcdb.org/search.php?resultsStyle=asList&sortBy=0&make=renault&model=- modus
(and that Wikipedia also lists as mini-MPV)
andyhao