http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0079766/

http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/images/ftvquadro_03.jpg

what car is it?
there is already an Austin 1800 and a Morris 1100 listed: http://www.imcdb.org/movie_79766-Quadrophenia.html

http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?ftvquadrof.htm

Ado16. Morris 1100 MkII. PLenty to choose from if you don't want another BMC

Could Morris 1100 be an Austin A40 Farina in "your" URL?

The pictures are so small... and I cannot recognize these cars so I cannot help you more

I thought I was helping you?

I thought you were asking me if it was possible that the Morris was an A40

I thought this was an open forum?

I was asking anyone

J'ai du mal à comprendre ce que veut "keef". Le site sur les anglaises, je le connais et c'est à partir des infos que j' ai relevées que je "recupère" les films pour les analyser. Essentiellemnt ceux où il y a des Triumph. C'est pourquoi j'ai listé Quadrophenia ou les Professionnels. S'il manque des voitures par rapport au site, c'est qu 'on ne les voit pas suffisemment pour être gardées. Mais s'il le faut, j'ai encore Quadrophenia, je peux donc reprendre le travail...

http://world.altavista.com/tr :-

[q]I have evil to include/understand what "keef wants". The site on English, I know it and [/q]

Are you saying you don't think the site is open enough, because it is mainly in English?

[q] it is starting from the infos that I noted that I "recupère" the films to analyze them. Essentiellemnt those where there is of Triumph. [/q]

I am sure we all have our favourites

[q]This is why I listed Quadrophenia or the Professionals. If it misses cars compared to the site, it is qu ' one does not see them suffisemment to be kept. [/q]

I *think* the idea is to get a good selection and maybe "pushing" our favourite make/model is not a good thing, but I'm sure the site's owner will point this out if he doesn't want any more of a particular car?

[q]But if it is needed, I still have Quadrophenia, I can thus resume work... [/q]

I'm sure any images would be welcome, but it may be that certain images will be deemed to poor in quality to use?

In this case an ADO16 is already listed so extra cars of the same shape should only be added in the comments, I think. Especially since those are background cars and because we cannot identify them clearly.

Maybe one thing that could be looked at is the process of additions?

I've tried adding via the comments and via the forum; not sure which is correct and probably made a hash of both, but perhaps a dedicated "blank input template" is the way to go? You could then check this and input if suitable?

I planned to add that, but there is some work for that and I had not time yet for this.
Currently the best solution for additions and pictures submission is the forum. For sending lots of pictures at a time the e-mail may be better.
For changes or extra details about currently listed vehicles, comments on the site are better.

OK, cheers for the advice.