Naming conventions » constructed under licence in Japan
constructed under licence in Japan
Published 08/03/2007 @ 17:22:23, By Jun
I wonder where is the origin
*example
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_92303-Hino-Renault-PA58-1958.html?PHPSESSID=2668f7b5e176eb62060e1aa2c61a6c75
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_92298-Nissan-Austin-A50-Cambridge-1956.html?PHPSESSID=2668f7b5e176eb62060e1aa2c61a6c75
These Renault, Austin, Hillman, Jeep and Henry J(Kaiser) was constructed under licence in Japan.
Some modifications are applied, but actually based on French, UK and US cars.
*example
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_92303-Hino-Renault-PA58-1958.html?PHPSESSID=2668f7b5e176eb62060e1aa2c61a6c75
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_92298-Nissan-Austin-A50-Cambridge-1956.html?PHPSESSID=2668f7b5e176eb62060e1aa2c61a6c75
These Renault, Austin, Hillman, Jeep and Henry J(Kaiser) was constructed under licence in Japan.
Some modifications are applied, but actually based on French, UK and US cars.
constructed under licence in Japan
Published 08/03/2007 @ 20:43:26, By antp
It is a common problem. "origin" is more "spiritual origin" or "country where it was originally designed" than build location.
I would list the Hino Renault as origin=France (as the car was designed there) but "made for=japan", as some details change.
For the other one, if it is the same car (i.e. same body style, etc.) simply built in Japan, I would maybe keep the original country flag (UK/US).
I notice that all except 2 Hino Renault are currently listed as origin=Japan, though.
Latest Edition: 08/03/2007 @ 20:44:22
I would list the Hino Renault as origin=France (as the car was designed there) but "made for=japan", as some details change.
For the other one, if it is the same car (i.e. same body style, etc.) simply built in Japan, I would maybe keep the original country flag (UK/US).
I notice that all except 2 Hino Renault are currently listed as origin=Japan, though.
Latest Edition: 08/03/2007 @ 20:44:22