Delete a Message
I do not find that the a little more compressed images look much less good.
Of course if you look closely you see more compression artefact, but for a general use the pic quality is still quite acceptable for the site and for the kind of use made here.
You make your pictures from original DVDs, many of the others (including me) usually do it from divx or recompressed DVDs, it is normal that the pic quality is a little less good (but do not worry about Ronin, my DVD is an original one
)
I can compress less than you, it will look a little better, but also waste a little more space and take more bandwidth (currently about 160 GB/month).
At a time it was decided that the average compression should be 20/25% to not loose too much quality and not loose to much space either.
Of course if you look closely you see more compression artefact, but for a general use the pic quality is still quite acceptable for the site and for the kind of use made here.
You make your pictures from original DVDs, many of the others (including me) usually do it from divx or recompressed DVDs, it is normal that the pic quality is a little less good (but do not worry about Ronin, my DVD is an original one
)I can compress less than you, it will look a little better, but also waste a little more space and take more bandwidth (currently about 160 GB/month).
At a time it was decided that the average compression should be 20/25% to not loose too much quality and not loose to much space either.