Old contributions (archive) » [done]Patton (1970)
[done]Patton (1970)
Published 08/04/2007 @ 19:07:57, By Pokeoddsponge
Several vehicles that were missing when the movie was added the other day (I had started this a while back but never finished, so with these the movie should be complete now.)
Dodge WC54 (*)
1953 Unknown M44 (**)
1951 Cadillac M41 'Walker Bulldog' (***)
1944 Cadillac M37 (**)
Latest Edition: 13/04/2007 @ 12:19:52
Dodge WC54 (*)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a2a0/6a2a07310e25f90d1b49aae06f1fbf5cc5e66627" alt="http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/WC54j.jpg http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/WC54j.jpg"
1953 Unknown M44 (**)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a8fd/7a8fd4f536f2152dbf42832342b5e2c02c011265" alt="http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/M44j.jpg http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/M44j.jpg"
1951 Cadillac M41 'Walker Bulldog' (***)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5a36/e5a36c9a4e750f575634d46915396dfb6191b71e" alt="http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/M41j.jpg http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/M41j.jpg"
1944 Cadillac M37 (**)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09e97/09e97fe7261a62efaedfc55cdec547f56b14afc2" alt="http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/M37j.jpg http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r312/Geforce2187/M37j.jpg"
Latest Edition: 13/04/2007 @ 12:19:52
Patton (1970)
Published 12/04/2007 @ 14:40:10, By Jun
Information about ratio is 2.20:1 by IMDb http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0066206/
Is it looks correct?
*640 x 291 (ratio is 2.20:1)
Is it looks correct?
*640 x 291 (ratio is 2.20:1)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad76e/ad76e6e4bd13ed6bef5894590810ea8768802e09" alt="http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/281/m44jfn3.th.jpg http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/281/m44jfn3.th.jpg"
Patton (1970)
Published 12/04/2007 @ 15:01:46, By antp
That looks better, though that 2.20 is strange as ratio
Btw why not keep the full width (720) of original images?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01e99/01e99aef138a86c2f5e3ab3f5239bd175a931a9c" alt=":confused: :confused:"
Btw why not keep the full width (720) of original images?
Patton (1970)
Published 12/04/2007 @ 15:16:45, By Jun
That looks better, though that 2.20 is strange as ratio
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01e99/01e99aef138a86c2f5e3ab3f5239bd175a931a9c" alt=":confused: :confused:"
Yes, strange ratio.
So I tried some ratio, and 2.20 is most natural for my eyes.
Quote From: antp
Btw why not keep the full width (720) of original images?Simply, that why already wickey post 640 x 272 pics.
I've converted those both 640&720. I'll list 720width if it is better.
(strangely wickey's ratio is 2.35 and correct. another ratio release
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01e99/01e99aef138a86c2f5e3ab3f5239bd175a931a9c" alt=":confused: :confused:"
Latest Edition: 12/04/2007 @ 15:30:13
Patton (1970)
Published 12/04/2007 @ 16:15:23, By antp
For pictures coming from a good source (dvd, good divx, ...) if the picture is sharp, it is better to keep its size, i.e 720 for a DVD.
If it is blurry (zoomed picture, VHS, TV, ...) then it is better to reduce it a little, e.g. 640 or less.
Latest Edition: 12/04/2007 @ 16:15:51
If it is blurry (zoomed picture, VHS, TV, ...) then it is better to reduce it a little, e.g. 640 or less.
Latest Edition: 12/04/2007 @ 16:15:51