Send an answer to a topic: Results of searches don't add up :-(
Warning, this subject is old (6082 days without answer)
antp
done
keef
strange that he renamed the car but forgot to add the mk
It happens
I added 'Farina' between A40 and Countryman.
Thanks.
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?resultsStyle=asImages&makeMatch=2&make=&modelMatch=- 0&model=ado8&modelInclModel=on&modelInclChassis=on = 28
plus http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?resultsStyle=asImages&makeMatch=2&make=&modelMatch=- 0&model=ado44&modelInclModel=on&modelInclChassis=on = 16
Total = 44
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make=Austin&model=A40+\'Farina\'
= 35
plus http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Innocenti_model-A40.html = 9
plus http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Austin_model-A40+Futura.html = 1
Total = 45
Diff is http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=156982 not marked up as ado8
antp
1st one : I did not add it as Mike is admin, strange that he renamed the car but forgot to add the mk
I added 'Farina' between A40 and Countryman.
I added 'Farina' between A40 and Countryman.
keef
Mk not been added from Feb comment
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_158543-Austin-A40--Farina--ADO44-1961.html
Farina not added to Countrymen :-
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_46364-Austin-A40-Countryman-ADO8-1959.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_158543-Austin-A40--Farina--ADO44-1961.html
Farina not added to Countrymen :-
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_46364-Austin-A40-Countryman-ADO8-1959.html
antp
well, that search still does not include Futura
keef
You mean having both ADO8 & ADO44 in one search? Yes, using current search possibilities it is not possible I guess.
It's possible :-
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Austin_model-A40+'Farina'.html
LOL!
Now 29.
antp
You mean having both ADO8 & ADO44 in one search? Yes, using current search possibilities it is not possible I guess.
keef
There is a Futura too, instead of Farina
Yep, that one is correct. A pity it can't "join" it's cousins, but ....
antp
There is a Futura too, instead of Farina
keef
Few were missing their ADO-code I guess
That would mean there should be less in (1) plus (2) were as there are still more