Delete a Message
I would like that!
Perhaps an additional field like 'only background cars not worth listing' would be good.
This way everyone can decide for himself if to watch it again or not. If I see that Stronghold listed the film any background cars not listed will have a size of one pixel at the most
On the other hand I might leave away a blurred one-star GS or 245, which might prompt Diehard or Wickey to look again.I agree with you, "a movie with no cars" is a definition that is dependable on who might see it. If we should choose to list movies with no car, we could come up with a definition for it. (If that is even remotely possible?). But it is not only like that with movies with no cars, the listing of background cars is very dependable of which admin adds them. I myself try to be consitent when I add background cars, but that is even not always the case....
..This was my idea .. Not to have a whole page wasted on an entry with No cars ... But a separate list ...just so that contributors/admins know ...what films (..which they think ..may contain vehicles) ..could check before wasting their time re-watching a movie in hope of finding a car (..I've done this often.!)
I'd vote for a separate listing with :- movie title, imdb # and I guess a name of who actually checked the movie and found Nothing.!
We don't need to waste so much space on Full page entries (..just a simple list to add to.!)
Note:- I have voted No ..for empty movie pages.
That seems a legimate goal. And I am more in favour of a seprate listing, rather then the way it is carried out now....