I'd add that imcdb is a fairly organic process. People come and go, so expertise changes with time. We don't have allocated responsibilities as admins for particular subject areas or tasks, but fit in where we can and where it's most useful. Plus trying to avoid intervening where it's not (ie where other folk know far more than I do or ever will, or where it would take me 15 minutes to check and confirm something which someone else can do in three seconds). As said above we admins also build up our own individual pictures of who our experts are and their reliability and therefore our confidence in trusting IDs outside our own comfort zones.

If you ever feel your comments and IDs are being ignored, there is this thread - http://imcdb.opencommunity.be/forum_topic-1987-66194-Non_Unidentified_Vehicles.html#p66194 .

However another trick to get your IDs included more quickly is to explain why it's a 1973 Bloggsmobile Zoom GTX - can be as brief as needed - a reference to the visible trim detail or a link to an online photo or to a comparable example already in our collection. That encourages admins to make the change more confidently.

And if you want to excavate within the older unidentifieds which have been accumulating cobwebs since imcdb began - go for it. Many have tried so instant success may be elusive .... Maybe a more effective way might be to pick a make from the list on the Home page, pull that up and then tackle those shown as Unknowns - I've done that every so often and you can build up a monmentum for an hour or two.