OpenCommunityimcdb - Non-Unidentified Vehicles

14/10/2023 @ 16:53:11: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

from that view it's not identifiable, combination of being too background and bad angle, nothing really visible to use as reference points

what I mean no cabin, no loader mechanism, no vents , no grill mask , no shape of engine bay and panels, no markings or livery so nothing really visible to give you a hint of what maker could it be

if there are other views more sideways angle would glad try it out again

this is a Henrickson carrier , exactly like in thumbnail just the main lights are on bumper and not cabin, it carries some rig
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1487711.html

14/10/2023 @ 20:20:22: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

would replace 530 with more generic Payloader

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_73834-Hough-530.html

15/10/2023 @ 02:48:30: JB007: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

17/10/2023 @ 11:53:30: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1830985

MIS-ID
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1368364

finally busted, thanks to the missing view went from very easy to medium to hard ... :chut:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1376019

busted
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1308796

this one visible just 1 second in a montage again,
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1368367

TCM ( a model before they adopted the TCM name) but I think its easier to list it as TCM
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1429166

90% sure this is an old Liebherr like the one I posted (same company markings also)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1353663

oldest unsolved crane busted , problem it's actually simple truck mounted JLG crane , most likely based on FORD truck (all old JLG truck cranes I found are Ford based)
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=525316

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1487711.html

18/10/2023 @ 20:16:36: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

19/10/2023 @ 15:51:53: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

shouldn't producer be China Railway Construction Heavy Industry Group Co., Ltd. ? or some abreviation of it
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1672973

and being at Jumbo drills solved
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1436510

mid-id is a Lonking version by script
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1298431

Xiamen ZL-Series
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1296300

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1834755.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1834298

this is same machine and looks like workshop special turkish style... , maybe list it as Custom made or seems the engine bay is from Massey Ferguson 165 name it after that ?
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1381928.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1544074-Massey-Ferguson-185.html

one of those quick location shots and IMO vehicle is too small visible , no details to make it out as color doesn't help...
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1562341.html

and some ATV
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1834438

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1826718

19/10/2023 @ 22:29:22: JB007: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

20/10/2023 @ 14:34:27: ChaserX: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

21/10/2023 @ 03:03:10: UKboy205: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

23/10/2023 @ 10:17:21: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: mike962

shouldn't producer be China Railway Construction Heavy Industry Group Co., Ltd. ? or some abreviation of it

Depends if all their products are named ZYS it can be seen as a make
Company name is not always the make, for products like that it is sometimes complicated, especially in countries like China and Russia where the notion of marketing is different :smile:

23/10/2023 @ 10:23:53: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: mike962

this is same machine and looks like workshop special turkish style... , maybe list it as Custom made or seems the engine bay is from Massey Ferguson 165 name it after that ?
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1381928.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1544074-Massey-Ferguson-185.html

Why not 185 like on the second page? Are they different? Is the second one wrongly listed?

23/10/2023 @ 10:56:59: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: antp

Why not 185 like on the second page? Are they different? Is the second one wrongly listed?

2nd was named wrong, I zoomed in again and it's a 6 not 8

23/10/2023 @ 11:00:20: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

23/10/2023 @ 11:17:32: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: UKboy205

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_1173088.html
GP 125, not GP125

X4, according to the comment

23/10/2023 @ 12:07:01: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

this were also busted, vintage swedish forklifts with ultra obscure maker , didn't even look for them but for something else and it just popped out...
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1040325
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_258281.html

wrong category
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1834908

24/10/2023 @ 17:50:24: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

25/10/2023 @ 01:18:16: UKboy205: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

25/10/2023 @ 15:54:11: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: mike962

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1834438.html

I moved it to comments last time you posted it here, but it seems I forgot to delete the page afterwards :grin: