Old contributions (archive) » [done] Kenny (2006)
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 11/02/2008 @ 05:39:30, By valiant1962
Have posted three files containing captures from Australian film Kenny (2006) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0822389/
Can one of the Moderators let me know if they have come through OK
Latest Edition: 11/02/2008 @ 20:31:57
Can one of the Moderators let me know if they have come through OK
Latest Edition: 11/02/2008 @ 20:31:57
Kenny (2006)
Published 11/02/2008 @ 10:42:30, By antp
One email arrived, with a zip file, and saying "One and two star cars to follow".
Kenny (2006)
Published 11/02/2008 @ 11:41:27, By valiant1962
Have re sent files 2 and 3. ant can you re check and confirm if they came through
Kenny (2006)
Published 11/02/2008 @ 20:31:48, By garco
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 12/02/2008 @ 06:57:33, By valiant1962
Some of the vehicles appear to be missing. I thought the pics were all clear enough to list
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 12/02/2008 @ 12:18:14, By antp
Indeed some of those which were skipped could still be listed I think.
But some are not enough visible for that, e.g. "chevrolet unkown pickup x.jpg" or "holden utility x.jpg" (same pic as Nissan Pursar)
Garco, did you skip many pics on purpose? Or did you plan to add these?
Latest Edition: 12/02/2008 @ 12:28:21
But some are not enough visible for that, e.g. "chevrolet unkown pickup x.jpg" or "holden utility x.jpg" (same pic as Nissan Pursar)
Garco, did you skip many pics on purpose? Or did you plan to add these?
Latest Edition: 12/02/2008 @ 12:28:21
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 14/02/2008 @ 16:55:39, By antp
I added few of the "missing" ones, those which seemed still ok to me.
Waliant1962 >> pictures seemed quite big: they appear pixelated, like if they were enlarged to 720 pixels wide from a lower size. What was the source? A DVD or a video file? Also, the JPEG compression seems a little weak, by just resaving some of them I got 20 KB smaller files; what do you use for compression/conversion? Usually a 20% compression is good (or quality at 80%, it depends on the program used).
Waliant1962 >> pictures seemed quite big: they appear pixelated, like if they were enlarged to 720 pixels wide from a lower size. What was the source? A DVD or a video file? Also, the JPEG compression seems a little weak, by just resaving some of them I got 20 KB smaller files; what do you use for compression/conversion? Usually a 20% compression is good (or quality at 80%, it depends on the program used).
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 14/02/2008 @ 20:59:38, By garco
No, I have skipped them because they are too background.
I was very surprised to see them on the site...
I was very surprised to see them on the site...
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 14/02/2008 @ 22:39:48, By antp
Well, the few that I added are not so background, no? (Except the Saab )
The International & Kenworth fill whole screen, the MB W203 is seen from two angles, the Transit is not so small and somewhat nice to see as ice cream truck version, the Integra is well visible in foreground, the Holden VP does not seem so common.
I agree that maybe the Bronco is not worth listing, I hesitated for that one.
Note that more than half of those that you skipped were too background, though, so I skipped these too.
Latest Edition: 14/02/2008 @ 22:42:41
The International & Kenworth fill whole screen, the MB W203 is seen from two angles, the Transit is not so small and somewhat nice to see as ice cream truck version, the Integra is well visible in foreground, the Holden VP does not seem so common.
I agree that maybe the Bronco is not worth listing, I hesitated for that one.
Note that more than half of those that you skipped were too background, though, so I skipped these too.
Latest Edition: 14/02/2008 @ 22:42:41
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 15/02/2008 @ 02:43:03, By valiant1962
What was the source? A DVD or a video file? Also, the JPEG compression seems a little weak, by just resaving some of them I got 20 KB smaller files; what do you use for compression/conversion? Usually a 20% compression is good (or quality at 80%, it depends on the program used).
I recorded it onto my hard drive recorder from TV. The movie was made documentary style using hand held camera so a lot of the action is a little blurred
[done] Kenny (2006)
Published 15/02/2008 @ 10:09:09, By antp
It is not the blur the problem but the "pixelated" aspect. Such images should be resized down a little I think.