Subject: Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
20/10/2025 @ 03:38:06: Harold B: Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections


We could list them as Crossley (the chassis) with Vickers as extra info (the body), as suggedted in https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_634952-Crossley-IGA1-Type-87-1925.html
So Type 87 is for the Japanese military model?


You could I guess, but "Vickers" always comes first in the way it's written about in books. I don't have any primary material that talks about it or I would defer to that.
Type 87 Armored Car is the Japanese military designation yes. None of them were actually built in Japan, that's old wrong info.
20/10/2025 @ 08:28:49: antp: Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
I Updated the Citroën, I wasn't sure indeed if they kept the B2 or not in their model name :wink:

About Crossley, if you think it is better, I could list them as Vickers as make with Crossley in extra info then?
Or would it be better to have both names in the make name?
20/10/2025 @ 13:04:36: Harold B: Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Or would it be better to have both names in the make name?


That's what I would do. Or "Vickers" as the make and "Crossley Armoured Car" as the model
20/10/2025 @ 17:06:40: antp: Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Indeed I could do that latter one, two were listed that way
... 
Back