04/01/2014 @ 00:40:06: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Google has deactivated ads from the site, mentioning that it contains Pornographic/Nude pictures.
However they do not provide a relevant URL...
Anyway, to avoid future problems, if you find nude pics (in comments or even maybe vehicle picture), it would be nice to report them here so I can eventually remove them, as I prefer to have Google's money than having a few random nude pics provided by Sixcyl and others.
Also, to reactivate ads I have to provide a few URLs to Google where such pics were removed.
04/01/2014 @ 01:24:01: antp: Nude pics vs Google
1st link : pics are useless (not even pretty
), I think, so they could simply be removed
2nd link : maybe just use the thumbnail picture as main picture, so the nude pic can also simply be removed.
04/01/2014 @ 04:53:56: owlman: Nude pics vs Google
04/01/2014 @ 05:06:32: night cub: Nude pics vs Google
04/01/2014 @ 11:38:19: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Wow that's a lot of results
Thanks for the search
I'll check these later
04/01/2014 @ 19:11:42: Love Krittaya: Nude pics vs Google
04/01/2014 @ 22:51:25: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Thanks for the lists.
I deleted the pics completely unrelated from the site from comments (i.e. actresses pictures) and so that were useless.
For the moment, I do not yet delete those which also show cars, that'll be if really we do not have choice; they could still be censored then.
05/01/2014 @ 13:17:39: 130rapid: Nude pics vs Google
It's worth to add some kind of 'Don't link close-to-nude photos, please' sentence to our Help/FAQ.
05/01/2014 @ 13:25:00: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Yes.
And I'll also censor the nude pics with cars by pixelating the nude contents. But I'll keep a backup of the original pictures, just in case of.
edit: I hesitate what to do for
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=7725 though...
However, some like
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=194002 or the ones from "The bodyguard" would still be acceptable I think (problem with Google and censorship is usually when butts, genitals or breasts are visible)
05/01/2014 @ 16:43:22: Ddey65: Nude pics vs Google
Does this have anything to do with the removal of bold text and links from my profile page?
05/01/2014 @ 17:29:00: antp: Nude pics vs Google
No, that's unrelated.
I made another change because when a profile contained too much text to parse it was quite heavy for the server. I'll increase the limit a little bit, as it seems that your profile is just above it.
05/01/2014 @ 21:57:19: mike962: Nude pics vs Google
06/01/2014 @ 00:19:47: chicomarx: Nude pics vs Google
^ that won't trigger anything. Google has some image recognition that's set to recognize boobs and other shapes in skin tone, not legs.
06/01/2014 @ 11:22:54: antp: Nude pics vs Google
I think that one is indeed still acceptable.
06/01/2014 @ 13:33:01: MisterZ: Nude pics vs Google
Do bare male bottoms count as nudity? I've uploaded maybe 2 that had bottoms visible.
06/01/2014 @ 13:43:45: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Depends how the are seen... if you can find the pages, post the links
06/01/2014 @ 16:46:46: antp: Nude pics vs Google
Google rejected the claim after a first cleaning, still not giving any example of what causes a problem.
No idea which page is concerned then, but if you notice some that should be cleaned it is still good to report them here.
But it is for sure matter of the nude pic/s?