05/12/2015 @ 12:31:55: Purzel89: Soon in movies (or not)
Yeah good one, finally we get a real Toyota Van again. The last ProAce was a Transporter with closed windows only. My father will love this
Only bad thing is that the rear looks like a terrible mix of Multivan and Caddy (and the car color adds to this...).
05/12/2015 @ 17:45:11: Baube: Soon in movies (or not)
Like the S90's new front end......as for the rear one..euh..euh....let's just say it's original....
04/01/2016 @ 13:01:41: Exiv96: Soon in movies (or not)
I'm not fond of the front end either. That sort-of P1800 grille is a bit too present. A bit like the recent Maserati sedans.
Yeah good one, finally we get a real Toyota Van again. The last ProAce was a Transporter with closed windows only.
I suppose you mean "Transporter" as "van" ? Because the first generation Proace was a Scudo-Jumpy-Expert, not a VW.
By the way, I have never seen a single Proace in real life ever ! Does Toyota actually sells them ?
09/01/2016 @ 23:34:01: night cub: Soon in movies (or not)
No, they skipped the North American market with the old hatch. The hatch market has been picking up with the Ford Focus, Mazda 3 and Golf.
I added the link to the article above.
10/01/2016 @ 00:11:23: Baube: Soon in movies (or not)
Like it... very nice... of course, this one has the RS package, would be nice to compare it with a regular one. In my hatchback-buying province, pretty sure it will get " a few " sales since the Ford Focus, Mazda 3, Kia Rio5 and a big bunch of other hatchbacks are seen absolutely everywhere...
This is, of course, if we do get it too ( but i don't see why we wouldn't...
)
As for the similar to Hyundai look.... a bunch of cars are now looking like a bunch of some other cars...
Just compare sedan versions of Ford Focus and Kia Forte.....
10/01/2016 @ 01:57:04: night cub: Soon in movies (or not)
Hopefully they've made many improvements over the old model. I rented one a few months ago and was not impressed at all.
12/01/2016 @ 08:41:33: night cub: Soon in movies (or not)
12/01/2016 @ 21:15:53: Sandie: Soon in movies (or not)
I like the look of that Lincoln, just a shame it's a Mondeo/Fusion underneath.
12/01/2016 @ 22:27:45: Baube: Soon in movies (or not)
Nice that the Ridgeline kept that double-action tailgate. Always liked the feature. Trunk in bed is not bad either...
13/01/2016 @ 01:34:34: dsl: Soon in movies (or not)
That Lincoln looks like a tidied-up Jag. Less shiny bling and it could look rather nice. And why are Lexus so determined to release such a stream of ugly products?? I read an interview in a very gullible magazine some weeks back when Lexus Head of Design (ha-ha) said he was happy that their styling polarised opinions, and thought "you poor sod" - what you're actually saying underneath the corporate management-speak is "I've got a shit job trying to do something with a team of failed incompetents".
13/01/2016 @ 01:38:09: night cub: Soon in movies (or not)
Acura tried it about a decade ago and is only coming out of it's styling funk. I guess they feel that ugly distinctive is better than generic.
13/01/2016 @ 02:26:27: Baube: Soon in movies (or not)
Can't wait for the Montreal Auto Show to open ( it does this friday ) after seeing all those pics of the Detroit one
13/01/2016 @ 16:17:47: Gamer: Soon in movies (or not)
The rear of the Lincoln reminds me of a US Mitsubishi Galant.
20/01/2016 @ 14:00:56: Zodiak: Soon in movies (or not)
If they would built one with fenders and a roof, and I had any money, this would be the only car built in this century I would really buy.
22/01/2016 @ 13:09:57: rjluna2: Soon in movies (or not)