Search
List of Categories
Who has read this topic?
Add Reply
Printable version
Activate notificationGeneral » Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Reminder of the previous message
this should be 1 star at most
Except if Lateef lies (
), I'd say 2-star... (very minor role, but still more than just a background role)
Except if Lateef lies (
), I'd say 2-star... (very minor role, but still more than just a background role)Lateef is confused to say the least
see the video footage yourself 16.48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gUxpg7PFBs
it exactly same role as that 1 star lawn mover ,
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_923850.html
just a chair essentially , even that this time it's even much worse visible than that lawn mover and the great Lateef didn't object to that being just one star...
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_929800-Pontiac.html
(posting again because it got stuck on the last page and was apparently ignored)
(posting again because it got stuck on the last page and was apparently ignored)
There is probably a way to identify a year range for that one
@Lateef > well explained, nothing to add
1) It doesn't matter. He's clearly not doing anything with the lawn mower apart from sitting on its stepside. No interaction = 1 star.
2) Sorry, but yes it is - the talking guy is sitting at its controls while the machinery apears to be running, thus he's the present operator of it, and he might potentially be listed as "loader operator" in the screenplay or the credits. There are many examples where if someone sitting in a car is talking, relaxing or doing ... whatever - and it gets two stars, no matter if the vehicle is running or not. While if someone is dancing on the roof of a car, it gets one star.
/ I'm done here.
why the f**k was this rejected then ?
http://pics.imcdb.org/13592/untitled.1690.jpg
as this machine had an active role to get rid of a getaway car , so it was actually used
you keep that background machine there just because one guy spoke from it and this one which was activly used for some stupid reason the admins say that it shouldn't be listed, it's so confusing and stupid
And now that I see it is from http://www.imcdb.org/movie.php?id=149431 ... you were especially annoying then with Neon and you wonder on how he reacted? Come one... be happy that he could not ban you 
Stop acting like if all was always done/judged by only one person and without context.
Stop acting like if all was always done/judged by only one person and without context.
Add Reply