General » Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Reminder of the previous message
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 00:50:43, By mike962
this was solved
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_684217.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_684217.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 11:21:28, By antp
reported too early, I hadn't checked these comments yet

Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 15:39:26, By Gamer
The year needs to be changed due to observations: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=66371
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 18:11:30, By mike962
Hyster unkwnon
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_428811.html
BTW couldn't a guy who knowns farming and construction vehicles be Admin too ?? so many admins but who focuses more on those things
maybe lighningboy or JCB ?
Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 18:24:55
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_428811.html
BTW couldn't a guy who knowns farming and construction vehicles be Admin too ?? so many admins but who focuses more on those things
maybe lighningboy or JCB ?

Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 18:24:55
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 18:26:00, By antp
Being admin is not useful for identifying these; if he posts in comments these can be renamed. JCB's identifications are considered as reliable so when he identifies something we rename it accordingly. But Lightningboy used to guess a lot at some time, hence why we started to wait for confirmation of what he identifies.
Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 18:26:38
Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 18:26:38
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 18:37:19, By mike962
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 18:40:08, By mike962
and this vehicles I mentioned
http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-7628-56481-we_keep_this_vehicles_.html#p56481
technically speaking they are not vehicles but rather motorized attachments , they need to be attached to a trailer
this is how they look on their own !! you can see they can't be driven on their own..
https://b-a.d-cd.net/8ba284u/480.jpg
http://agrobiz.net/modules/text/images/200_200_970_favoritmbb5.jpg
http://www.motorsich.com/image.php/2255-mb8.jpg?width=250&image=/images/article/2255-mb8.jpg
Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 18:41:10
http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-7628-56481-we_keep_this_vehicles_.html#p56481
technically speaking they are not vehicles but rather motorized attachments , they need to be attached to a trailer
this is how they look on their own !! you can see they can't be driven on their own..
https://b-a.d-cd.net/8ba284u/480.jpg
http://agrobiz.net/modules/text/images/200_200_970_favoritmbb5.jpg
http://www.motorsich.com/image.php/2255-mb8.jpg?width=250&image=/images/article/2255-mb8.jpg
Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 18:41:10
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 22:12:36, By mike962
thik it's solved
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_684493.html
see thumbanils comments , we could use that pic since it looks same tank
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_18703-ZTS-Martin-T-55-1964.html
Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 22:13:57
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_684493.html
see thumbanils comments , we could use that pic since it looks same tank
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_18703-ZTS-Martin-T-55-1964.html
Latest Edition: 13/03/2014 @ 22:13:57
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 13/03/2014 @ 22:31:17, By eLMeR
Found by cl82?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=684564
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=684564
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 14/03/2014 @ 17:12:25, By eLMeR
Thanks for it. Still missing the 1983 model year. As for:
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_636344-Subaru-Libero-E12.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_161058-Subaru-Libero.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_407426-Subaru-Libero.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_216082-Subaru-Libero.html
and http://imcdb.org/vehicle_117230-Subaru-Libero.html
And 1994 model year for this one:
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_59385-Subaru-Libero.html
Wikipedia: The Subaru Sumo, known as the Libero in European markets except the UK, Norway, and Sweden, and as the Domingo in the Japanese market, was a microvan produced from 1983 to 1998
(Strange car: the official car's name -Sumo- was never used anywhere...)
And this one:
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_248852-Subaru-Libero-1994.html
is not a Libero, as said in the second comment. It's the kei-car version, a 1994 Subaru Sambar VW replica, with the VW logo quite visible in the second picture of the first comment.
Like this one, which is missing the (1994) year:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_490396-Subaru-Sambar.html
Would Sambar VW replica identification not be better than Sambar 'VW Look'?
Latest Edition: 17/03/2014 @ 20:29:47
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 14/03/2014 @ 19:19:19, By mike962
Caterpillar Sixty
distinct shape matches and most produced crawler of the 20s
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_276566.html
distinct shape matches and most produced crawler of the 20s
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_276566.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 14/03/2014 @ 22:34:07, By eLMeR
http://imcdb.org/vehicles_make-GME_model-Rascal.html
Should be all at least 1986+ models, so as should be non-dated Bedford Rascal mini-vans:
Sold from 1986 to 1994, the Rascal[...]
It was sold under GM's British-based Bedford marque as well as in Suzuki form. Other names were used in a few international markets, such as GME (General Motors Europe) for those continental European markets where Suzukis were generally not marketed and where the "Bedford" and "Vauxhall" brands were largely unknown.
(Wp)
While only searching with the model name, GME models join luckily the Bedford and Vauxhall Rascal. Will it be possible, with the IMCDb "next generation" to have them join the Suzuki Super Carry the same way?
This way, identification problems like this one would be almost automatically solved
For non-dated Suzuki Super Carry, the minimal model year seems to be 1985.
Should be all at least 1986+ models, so as should be non-dated Bedford Rascal mini-vans:
Sold from 1986 to 1994, the Rascal[...]
It was sold under GM's British-based Bedford marque as well as in Suzuki form. Other names were used in a few international markets, such as GME (General Motors Europe) for those continental European markets where Suzukis were generally not marketed and where the "Bedford" and "Vauxhall" brands were largely unknown.
(Wp)
While only searching with the model name, GME models join luckily the Bedford and Vauxhall Rascal. Will it be possible, with the IMCDb "next generation" to have them join the Suzuki Super Carry the same way?
This way, identification problems like this one would be almost automatically solved

For non-dated Suzuki Super Carry, the minimal model year seems to be 1985.
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 15/03/2014 @ 12:29:14, By mike962
episode needs added
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_158751-Subaru-Sambar-1990.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_158750-Mazda-Bongo-Brawny.html
Latest Edition: 15/03/2014 @ 12:29:31
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_158751-Subaru-Sambar-1990.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_158750-Mazda-Bongo-Brawny.html
Latest Edition: 15/03/2014 @ 12:29:31
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 15/03/2014 @ 16:45:34, By mike962
this was solved
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_680140.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_680140.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 15/03/2014 @ 20:14:03, By mike962
producer for this
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_681172-Foxhound.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_681172-Foxhound.html
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 17/03/2014 @ 16:39:30, By antp
@eLMeR > this thread is not for missing info, just for missed info.
i.e. for example for the GME Rascal you could post on one of the page that info about the year, with a comment "to also apply to other Rascal of the site".
Also, please avoid off-topic here, the purpose of this topic is to quickly see what was missed from comments, mostly with links posted to vehicle pages. If there are reply needed or info to analyse, it loses its original purpose. Other topics can be created for other kind of subjects.
Latest Edition: 17/03/2014 @ 16:41:05
i.e. for example for the GME Rascal you could post on one of the page that info about the year, with a comment "to also apply to other Rascal of the site".
Also, please avoid off-topic here, the purpose of this topic is to quickly see what was missed from comments, mostly with links posted to vehicle pages. If there are reply needed or info to analyse, it loses its original purpose. Other topics can be created for other kind of subjects.
Latest Edition: 17/03/2014 @ 16:41:05
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 17/03/2014 @ 20:29:02, By eLMeR
Ok, sorry for the mess. As my very first identification (a "Ford Escape II") was renamed 1998 Ford Escape (without the version number) by the admin who validated it, I thought the year was an important part of the information. Seems eventually not, as some of my further suggestions about year models weren't noted, even if provided with well-reasoned arguments
And I didn't check the missing info/missed info difference of that topic. So if I find a car that has been identified some days/weeks/months ago in comments but which stays as "unknown" in the database, it's here I have to say it. But comments of the vehicle are the place to give further information. Understood.
Off-topic removed.

And I didn't check the missing info/missed info difference of that topic. So if I find a car that has been identified some days/weeks/months ago in comments but which stays as "unknown" in the database, it's here I have to say it. But comments of the vehicle are the place to give further information. Understood.
Off-topic removed.
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 17/03/2014 @ 22:03:21, By antp
So if I find a car that has been identified some days/weeks/months ago in comments but which stays as "unknown" in the database, it's here I have to say it.
Only if it was really "missed": if it is a comment from a new user or from an unreliable user, it may also simply wait for confirmation

Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 17/03/2014 @ 23:11:45, By eLMeR
I understood I had to wait, for some of my suggestions. Just hopping it's due to my "new user" status, not to the "unreliable" one

Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 18/03/2014 @ 18:22:43, By mike962
bunch of MIS ID
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=231416
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=77683
reanalized, staring with L and cabin on the left side means 3 options, Link-Belt, Lorain and Lima and after reanalizying them their design fits clearly most with Lorain so suggest
Lorain unknown
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_381018-Link-Belt.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_546763-Link-Belt.html
what Garco says, Cincinatti cab means it could be eveything and you need real closeup cos that cab was used by nearly all producers
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=312407
P&H unknown
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=685874
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=573654
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=684415
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_685377.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_685374.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_685378.html
shouldn't all pics be replaced ?
http://imcdb.org/movie.php?id=47034
can this be cosnidered unsovlbale cos you don't see main body ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_229652.html
Latest Edition: 18/03/2014 @ 18:23:35
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=231416
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=77683
reanalized, staring with L and cabin on the left side means 3 options, Link-Belt, Lorain and Lima and after reanalizying them their design fits clearly most with Lorain so suggest
Lorain unknown
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_381018-Link-Belt.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_546763-Link-Belt.html
what Garco says, Cincinatti cab means it could be eveything and you need real closeup cos that cab was used by nearly all producers
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=312407
P&H unknown
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=685874
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=573654
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=684415
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_685377.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_685374.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_685378.html
shouldn't all pics be replaced ?
http://imcdb.org/movie.php?id=47034
can this be cosnidered unsovlbale cos you don't see main body ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_229652.html
Latest Edition: 18/03/2014 @ 18:23:35
Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Published 18/03/2014 @ 18:30:52, By antp
Aren't you a little impatient ?

That has been done, before I saw your comment here
Add Reply