IMCDb Forum
Naming conventions » Mark added
Category:  
« Previous topic
Reminder of the previous message
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 01/06/2006 @ 22:25:57, By antp
Thanks


Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 02/12/2006 @ 21:32:13, By antp
Thanks. Strange that I missed the 1st one.
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 10/01/2007 @ 22:30:18, By antp
thanks
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 15/01/2007 @ 17:27:02, By antp
For Land-Rover, this is because usually we were waiting for Alexander to confirm, but he didn't post since last week of December. Maybe he is away for vacation or something like that :confused:
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 14/03/2007 @ 22:16:49, By antp
For those that you just posted today and that were not missed it is not useful to repeat them here :tongue:

About http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=93070 rpcm said "the designation MkIII doesn't apply to the 1300GT"... is it wrong?
So I removed it for http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=48693 but I do not know who re-added it.

Latest Edition: 14/03/2007 @ 22:17:28
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 14/03/2007 @ 22:31:18, By Bebert
C'est moi qui vient de faire la "mise à jour". Je pense que keef est assez fiable sur le sujet. :wink:
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 14/03/2007 @ 22:34:11, By antp
Personne n'est parfait, donc c'est pour cela que je pose la question : rpcm semble quand même très fiable aussi...
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 25/03/2007 @ 19:13:57, By keef
For those that you just posted today and that were not missed it is not useful to repeat them here :tongue:


It's difficult to know what to do as posts do still seem to be mised :sad:

At least if I list them here someone might look at them. :tongue:

About http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=93070 rpcm said "the designation MkIII doesn't apply to the 1300GT"... is it wrong?
So I removed it for http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=48693 but I do not know who re-added it.


Have a look at http://www.ado16.info/index.shtml?mk3_regist.shtml (the link might not work, but you can navigate to it from the home page then register then Mk3.

If you want to be totally accurate Mk1 was never used (probably the same for most manufacturers?). I thought it was just a good way of indentifying the rough year of a car? Things like adding the Mk BEFORE the type e.g. Countryman might further help sorting etc.

If you want to remove things how about "Two Door" in http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=68385 or perhaps add 4 door to "all" the others?

made by Authi - http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=15257

Latest Edition: 25/03/2007 @ 19:26:43
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
Mark added
Published 25/03/2007 @ 19:41:55, By antp
The "Two Door" was added by Sixcyl, I removed it.
"Made by Authi" is maybe more useful. We write that as a compromise between listing them under Authi make and not mentionning Authi at all.
Add Reply - Category:  
Sign In :: Sign Up :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2025 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare