IMCDb Forum
Old contributions (archive) » [Done] bedtime stories 2008
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
[Done] bedtime stories 2008
Published 03/01/2009 @ 21:23:51, By typhlosion
heres a ton of new car pics!!!

http://imcdb.org/movie.php?id=960731

1. 1966 chevy corvair corsa convertible (btw i just bought a 1964 chevy corvair greenbrier!!!)(check it out on cardomain!!!)
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/5098/1966corvaircorsaconvertvz7.th.jpg

2.00's chevy ventra extended van
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/8206/00schevyventraextendedcs0.th.jpg

3.70's ford f-150
http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/2112/70sfordf150td4.th.jpg

4.00's chevy express
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/4770/00schevybexpressyw3.th.jpg

5.00'chrysler sebring
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/2509/00schryslersebringiu5.th.jpg

6.90's honda crv
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6637/90shondacrvhj6.th.jpg

7.90's saturn sl
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/2269/90ssaturnslqa9.th.jpg

8.00's honda crv ex
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/4778/00shondacrvexhd8.th.jpg

9.unknown suv
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/8418/unkownsuvzc0.th.jpg

10.00's ferrari 360
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/7462/00sferrari360ml9.th.jpg

11.00's volvo semi
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/7066/00svolvoseminv9.th.jpg

12.00's ferrari f430
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3268/00sferrarif430ct6.th.jpg

13.vw new beetle
http://img61.imageshack.us/img61/4088/vwnewbeetlefe1.th.jpg

14.00's ferrari f430
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/9360/00sferrarif4301us6.th.jpg

15.00's saab 900 convertible
http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/5782/00ssaab900convertibleqq3.th.jpg

16.00's chevy equinox
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/8577/00schevyequinoxcl9.th.jpg

17.00's volvo xc90
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/8079/00svolvoxc90na4.th.jpg

18.00's chevy c6 corvette
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4742/00sc6corvettedy6.th.jpg

19.00's international flatbed tow truck
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/6731/00sinternationalflatbedps3.th.jpg

20.00's toyota prius
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/7385/00stoyotapriusvr3.th.jpg

21.unknown harley
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/4857/harleyes3.th.jpg

22.00's ford focus
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/8239/00sfordfocusdb5.th.jpg

23.90's cadillac fleewood
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/2019/90scadillacfleetwoodrk3.th.jpg

24.00's chrysler pt cruiser convertible
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/222/00schryslerptcruiserconut4.th.jpg

25.00's mini cooper
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/1782/00sminicooperih9.th.jpg

26.00's chevy suburban
http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/9758/00schevysuburbanur6.th.jpg

27.00's toyota prius
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/5899/00stoyotaprius2em2.th.jpg

28.unknown firetruck
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/1980/unknownfiretruckar7.th.jpg

29.90's volvo station wagon
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/2007/90svolvostationwagonnf0.th.jpg

30.00's toyota prius
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8154/00stoyotaprius3oo4.th.jpg

31.80's amc jeep wagoneer
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/1105/80samcjeepwagoneerxf2.th.jpg

32.00'dodge durango
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/2593/00sdodgedurangosd4.th.jpg

33.00's ferrari f430
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/115/00sferrarif4302jd1.th.jpg

Latest Edition: 03/03/2009 @ 13:42:56
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 03/01/2009 @ 22:27:40, By Ddey65
There's a good chance this was made before Ford made the F-150.
http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/2112/70sfordf150td4.th.jpg
While it is a Ford F-Series, it couldn't possibly have been an F-150, because this was made between 1967 and 1972, and Ford didn't make the F-150 until 1976.



This SUV is a Ford too:
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/8418/unkownsuvzc0.th.jpg
An Expedition.
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 03/01/2009 @ 23:19:49, By typhlosion
This SUV is a Ford too:
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/8418/unkownsuvzc0.th.jpg
An Expedition.

thats what i was thinking but theres something that just doesn't look right about it!!!
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 24/02/2009 @ 13:21:01, By vilero
@typhlosion: could you say the star role in each case.

Post Data: also could you get a copy of this movie?. It's a new one (2008) and the images are very blurred.
Here http://www.traileraddict.com/tags/bedtime-stories you have 27 trailers and most of them in HD.
Except Ferraris, Chevy Corvair, Saab 900, Prius, Harley and Focus, the rest are very blurred or too far or in a very partial view.
Thanks
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 24/02/2009 @ 15:25:49, By ville84
15.00's is a SAAB 9-3 Cabrio

Latest Edition: 24/02/2009 @ 15:32:53
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 24/02/2009 @ 16:01:12, By ville84
29.90's volvo station wagon
http://img230.imageshack.us/my.php?image=90svolvostationwagonnf0.jpg

Volvo V90? or 960?
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 24/02/2009 @ 16:09:02, By antp

Post Data: also could you get a copy of this movie?. It's a new one (2008) and the images are very blurred.
Here http://www.traileraddict.com/tags/bedtime-stories you have 27 trailers and most of them in HD.


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)

Latest Edition: 24/02/2009 @ 16:10:10
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 24/02/2009 @ 17:05:20, By vilero
..............................
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)

I have just mailed typhlosion with the easy way to get captures. Better wait a few days for his answer.
But if he doesn't, I think it's a pity to keep in "contributions" this post and the other you said
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 25/02/2009 @ 00:54:45, By typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)


that has nothing to do with this particular movie! if its a new or newer movie you can't even tell i use a camera like for instance the gone in 60 seconds (1974) i did was with a camera and you didn't notice but it was that it was a high quality movie!!!
i took these with my camera but i got these from a illegal movie download site before the movie even came out in theaters and it was in the quality you see before you!!!
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 25/02/2009 @ 01:13:04, By ford_guy
Yes, but no matter how good your camera is, the quality will always only be supbar compared to captures you get from using a computer program to take them. It's really not that hard. I learned recently thanks to antp and other members on here. Check the tutorial :wink:

But I really don't think having these images would be beneficial, in my honest opinion.
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 25/02/2009 @ 01:53:18, By typhlosion
Yes, but no matter how good your camera is, the quality will always only be supbar compared to captures you get from using a computer program to take them. It's really not that hard. I learned recently thanks to antp and other members on here. Check the tutorial :wink:

But I really don't think having these images would be beneficial, in my honest opinion.


yes and i am gonna try tonight!!!!
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 25/02/2009 @ 02:37:03, By typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)



ok um i followed that one guy directions and downloaded wmcp and tried it and it worked!!! wont play audio right for some reason but it captures good!!! son i will watch on wmp the i will get the images on wmcp!!! so what i will do in the future is rerent bullitt, french connection, american graffiti, and 2 other movie i did all ready!!!
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 25/02/2009 @ 02:47:06, By typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)


great that i have a faster and waaaaaaaaaaaaaay better way to do this but i am gonna have about 560 images to redo!!!!!!! yeah thats gonna take me awhile!!!
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 25/02/2009 @ 02:58:50, By typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)


actually i have 2 more movies that i did on camera that i think i will use any ways because there pretty good quality and i bet more than 95% are acceptable!!!

yeah i just checked and compared to the last ones i did almost if not all are more than acceptable by your standards as images!!!
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 25/02/2009 @ 10:19:04, By antp
if its a new or newer movie you can't even tell i use a camera like for instance the gone in 60 seconds (1974) i did was with a camera and you didn't notice but it was that it was a high quality movie!!!


I noticed that colors/sharpness was strange, I thought this was due to a VHS copy or something like that...
On these pics it was indeed less visible that it was it was taken with a camera.
But on some of the latest ones submitted, it is very visible.
Direct link to this message Edit  Quote  Add this message as quote for multiple quotes  Delete  Top  Bottom
bedtime stories 2008
Published 03/03/2009 @ 13:42:06, By vilero
I'm very sorry but you must understand that I must answer (same contiditions) that I wrote here http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4439-Done_over_250_new_pics_for___the_french_connection___1971.html

I'll tyr to explain in a polite way (if my poor english let me) than with pics like yours 253, we'll ruin the page
http://imcdb.org/movie_67116-The-French-Connection.html

Have a look there and you'll see that there are now 4 contributors in this page. All pics are submited with DVD (or nearly) quality.
Imagine that you find a movie not listed or partially listed. Well in that case there isn't problem (or less problem) with your pics. Bad or good pics we'll submited them and, later, when you or other user get the movie in a better quality we'll changed the old pics for the better new ones but you will be as provider of this movie since you posted them before.
But if we let these pics, we must say YES to everything that other user wants to be submited.
Do you understand this position?
With pages previuosly listed, the site must improve its quality, and doesn't get worse.

It's hard and difficult to me say you (with your previuos big effort) that your pics don't satisfy the contidions of backgrounds cars http://imcdb.org/help.php#HelpGuidelines

I encourage you to go on, but not this way, please.
Get a program that let you make screen captures (I told you by private), tested before you post here, also have a look to this tutorial http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-1201-How_you_can_submit_pictures.html (you can also in free download get XnView) and you will see (then) how many time you lost before and the easy way to post goods cars here.
Don't become disheartened by my words. The better way to know everything is to make a mistake and stand up again.
Thanks


Note: the gumball rally (1976) group project http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4493-the_gumball_rally_1976_group_project.html
And thunder road (1958) http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4495-thunder_road_1958.html are well.
Except some cars already listed, others seen through the window of other car and some with partial view, will be submited in the site
Sign In :: Sign Up :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2024 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare