A new IMCDb milestone has been reached...

500 x 30

There are some already identified by some of the members, but I am thinking that they are not confirmed by any of the administrator

Quite possible. There are probably a large amount of unknown vehicles that actually simply wait to be renamed.

There is a topic about that on the forum, for those that we missed.
Also sometimes an identification is made by a new member (or by someone who is not known as being reliable) and we wait that a more reliable user or an admin confirms it.

Looks like it is down to 498 pages now

I'll try to identify some of unknown vehicles listed at random pages from time to time

I do the same thing rjluna2. I regularly pick a page of unidentified vehicles randomly and try to identify them.

Antp, have you considered putting a random unknown vehicle thumbnail near the top of every page load? (along with a "Do you know me?" or "Please ID me!" line )
I thought someone suggested this in the past but I can't find that post now. It could help reduce the number of unknowns.... maybe not

I could at least do that on the home page...
I could include that near the ad, but it will decrease the size available for recently added movies.
Or I could put that at the bottom of the pages, but who scrolls until there?

Hmmm, one trouble it's the lost comments. In these comments, many cars are identified correctly. But with few admins and many comments, are difficult to watch all, IMHO.

Yikes, tried looking through some random pages, we need experts in really old cars,all types of buses, and all sorts of odd vehicles.

And bikes, most of all bikes.

And users for other "non-traditional" countries... i'm the only contribuitor for Argentina, for example.

One thing I have been noticing more of are car interiors from TV shows - those are going to likely remain unknown, so maybe there should be a recommendation to move those to the comments.

It is difficult to decide what can be listed or not.
Usually I avoid to list the cars when nothing except the dashboard+windscreen is visible, but saying "no car interior" is too strict I think.
For example I listed http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_458426-Ford-Focus-2000.html because a big part was visible (and indeed it was quickly identified)

I agree that unidentifiable interiors/windscreens could be moved to comments.

Now these unidentified vehicles listed at imcdb.org are creeping up to 560 pages

I did some random comments to sort of bumping the message